Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helotes Park Terrace
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Elkman (Elkspeak) 21:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Helotes Park Terrace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not clear why this housing subdivision is notable among the hundreds in each city. No improvement in the article in over a year. Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Absolutely no assertion or indication of notability, and nothing in 5 pages of Google hits. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! 23:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Checked Master of Puppet's Google search, came away with same conclusion - no notability at all. Tanthalas39 (talk) 01:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (clarify policy, please): My understanding from a year or two ago is that WP policy allows even very small geographic and urban entities their own articles. However, I did not find a reference in a cursory search. Would someone point to a policy guideline, please? If a contra-indicative reference is provided I'm prepared to change my recommendation. Hu (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no assertion of notability. Subdivisions are generally not notable. There is no assertion of notability in the article. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable --Pwnage8 (talk) 21:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.