Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermann Bauer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 21:39, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
NN, D. ComCat 04:25, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - nomination is one of a whole slew, appears bogus. Guettarda 06:13, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Bauer was, according to the stubby article, "a commander of the U-boat forces of the Kaiserliche Marine during World War I". He is also mentioned elsewhere on Wikipedia as the author of a book on submarines, which, after being translated by Hyman Rickover, "became a basic text for the US submarine service". Seems obviously notable. Keep. Uppland 06:17, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Bauer is a key figure in the history of submarine warfare. I'll see if I can dig up some more info to flesh out the article. -- Kaszeta 12:49, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Repeated attempts have been made to discourage this user from frivolous VfD nominations (see User talk:ComCat), and to no avail. What do we do now? Agentsoo 13:53, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- A request for comment is in order, followed by a trip to arbitration if his behavior doesn't improve in the face of consensus. I'll gladly endorse your view--this is a ridiculous nomination. Meelar (talk) 14:18, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
- If nobody will do it, I'll do the RFC this afternoon (I'm late for lunch as it is). -- Kaszeta 15:34, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Done, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/ComCat. Please go there and comment if you feel this and other VfDs of his are bogus -- Kaszeta 03:29, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Please assume good WP:FAITH. The nominator seems to be confused with the VfD process and taking this to RfC seems to be jumping the gun. Hall Monitor 18:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Done, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/ComCat. Please go there and comment if you feel this and other VfDs of his are bogus -- Kaszeta 03:29, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If nobody will do it, I'll do the RFC this afternoon (I'm late for lunch as it is). -- Kaszeta 15:34, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- A request for comment is in order, followed by a trip to arbitration if his behavior doesn't improve in the face of consensus. I'll gladly endorse your view--this is a ridiculous nomination. Meelar (talk) 14:18, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep — brain-dead nomination. — RJH 15:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, of course. I'd say anyone who reaches the rank of Admiral rates an article, plus he wrote an important book. Tualha (Talk) 00:30, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This article firmly establishes notability and has been expanded since its original nomination. [1] Hall Monitor 18:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Tony the Marine 16:05, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Robert McClenon 16:17, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Enough of this. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 21:39, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
.