Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiroko Mita
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 08:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hiroko Mita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Notability in question since May '07, fails WP:V and WP:BIO as well. Wizardman 15:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Because to be stub is not sin and this article in Japanese Wikipedia presents the list of works of this actress. Zero Kitsune (talk) 03:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and put notability question to rest. The links to IMDB and JMDB have clearly established that this actress is noteworthy and have been there from the first version of the article. Fg2 (talk) 11:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 11:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a note, she was in four films, all bit roles in what appear to be non-notable movies. Unless I'm missing something, notability isn't established from those two links, if anything it shows non-notability unless something else is found. Wizardman 11:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm, the way I see it, she played the lead in "Let's Gotokuji" and was the first supporting actress in "Miyuki." The latter won an award and garnered another nomination (even if not for Hiroko Mita). The other movies may not have been nominated for awards, but don't they appear to be legitimate commercial releases? Fg2 (talk) 12:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There does not appear to be a body of work that indicates notability....to date, it appears to be bit roles. If a body of work develops, then notability may be established. --Stormbay (talk) 18:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Might otherwise be notable, but the criterion here is notability supplied by the article itself, and that is zero. GregorB (talk) 22:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Looking at the Japanese article, she is also a popular singer, has been in numerous TV commercials, also looking at this whatlinkshere to her page, there is over 100 articles on the ja wikipedia that link to her article. There is a translation request on the talk page. Maybe we should notify someone at the Japanese WikiProject to contribute to this discussion. —Borgardetalk 15:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.