Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House L'Envers
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Kushiel's Legacy. –MuZemike 06:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- House L'Envers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional group with no real-world significance D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Kushiel's Legacy. Someone's bound to search for it, which means it meets WP:R#KEEP Criteria 5. I understand that you don't see the point to merging cruft, but why not just redirect it?--hkr (talk) 14:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cause changing an article into a redirect is the exact same thing as deleting it, for all practical purposes. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 15:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I strongly disagree with this assessment. Redirects are not the same as deletions. A redirect is a useful guidance tool for readers, a deleted article is a redlink that invites new users to recreate articles.--hkr (talk) 00:07, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cause changing an article into a redirect is the exact same thing as deleting it, for all practical purposes. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 15:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete redirect and delete are somewhat different... and I'd accept a redirect. But we can agree on the problem. No real world significance because no sources exist to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:46, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Kushiel's Legacy per WP:CHEAP. No demonstration of independent notability. —chaos5023 (talk) 05:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.