Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How-To Geek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. a website being a website does not demonstrate notability, nor are there any arguments negating the reasons put forth for deletion. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 01:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How-To Geek

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable Google hits or coverage found in Google News. Google Scholar didn't return any notable coverage either, the only thing I can find there is HTG being cited in a handful of obscure publications. Overall fails GNG. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 00:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 00:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 00:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current sourcing is abysmal, zero notability is proven by this directory entry and primary source. Toadspike (talk) 02:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete @EpicPupper, Did you check DuckDuckGo and/or Bing? Google is not the only search engine. But I checked there too and couldn't find anything. Rlink2 (talk) 15:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hiya @Rlink2! Yes, I did (DuckDuckGo’s actually my preferred search engine), just forgot to mention it here. Cheers! 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 20:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only a primary source and a domain lookup. No notability. Gabe114 (talk) 12:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I searched on Google and this website is a website. No need to delete it just because some people are offended and want to “cancel” it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.171.10 (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.