Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How Far Shallow Takes You
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snowball Keep - I'm hesitating to say per bad faith nomination looking at the string's of AFD but album clearly deserves an article--JForget 00:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How Far Shallow Takes You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per WP:Music: All articles on albums or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines. Individual articles on albums should include independent coverage. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 02:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep Just because there's no independent coverage present doesn't mean that none exists at all. Even if this were a permanent stub, "merge" does not mean "take to AfD". Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep album by a notable band on a notable label. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 15:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable album by a notable group. Should be marked as unsourced. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep I fully agree with TenPoundHammer. This article is clearly within the scope of Wikipedia, and I see no reason why we shouldn't allow it to exist as a stub. The fact that one band's entire discography was suddenly nominated for deletion, leads me to believe there may be a little more to this nomination than what meets the eye... and I simply do not support deletion for recreational purposes. -- WikHead (talk) 22:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep I think LegoTech either really doesn't like GOB or he hasn't even read WP:Music, because this is a notable album, by a notable artist. He's tagges almost every GOB related article for AFD, wouldn't that be abusing your rights to edit wikipedia?[The Spooky One] | [t c r] 20:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree Legotech may need an editing suspension. OOODDD (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.