Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunspell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no concensus. - Mailer Diablo 12:40, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to be a notable program. —Gaff ταλκ 05:57, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 07:45, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, though this needs expansion and some cleanup. AFAIK Hunspell replaced MySpell in OOo 2.0 (I think, I heard someone rambling about this, could be wrong though), and if MySpell has a nice extensive article, Hunspell deserves one too. --Wwwwolf 10:59, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this convoluted piece of nn. Ifnord 11:25, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Ifnord --MacRusgail 16:48, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A presentation from September 2005 OpenOffice.org Conference announced that Hunspell was going to replade MySpell in OpenOffice.org, see this PDF. OpenOffice 2.0 wasn't released then yet. I don't understand, if Hunspell is in OpenOffice 2.0 yet, though. [1] Even if it isn't, you should keep this article, because you have kept an article about Mozilla Calendar, the Calendar's version number isn't more than 0.2. Both programs are future promises from notable open source projects. -Hapsiainen 18:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Hapsiainen. I wikified it and added a link to the PDF Haps. mentioned. Chick Bowen 03:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.