Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyundai Portico
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:46, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hyundai Portico (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The Hyundai Portico concept of 2005 has had no published indication of intent for production beyond 2010. It is assumed at this point the vehicle's production has been cancelled, or shelved indefinitely. This article of the Portico as a production vehicle should be deleted. Dirty Blueshirt (talk) 01:13, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:33, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:33, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment -- may be worth to keep it as an article about the concept vehicle. I'm seeing some coverage in industry related journals: link. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Might be possible to keep, but an article on a proposed car that ended up never being produced seems a bit minor for WP. Borock (talk) 03:23, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sure there are notable concept cars, but this does not seem so special.Borock (talk) 03:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete on second thoughts per discussion above. The sources that I listed above provide rather trivial mentions anyway. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Probably WP:TOOSOON. -- Dane2007 talk 06:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.