Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMacsoft iPod to Mac Transfer
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 15:15, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- IMacsoft iPod to Mac Transfer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTGUIDE --Σ talkcontribs 08:00, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:15, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication this process satisfies notability. Edison (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article creator only has made this one edit - likely advertising MadCow257 (talk) 15:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unreferenced, unencyclopedic, no indication of notability, created by an SPA. Dialectric (talk) 17:18, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks independent secondary sources WP:RS to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Google searches turn up download sites, etc., but nothing that could be used to establish notability. I applaud all entrepreneurs who take it upon themselves to create stuff. But the article is written as an advertisement, clearly intended as WP:PROMOTION, lacks sources and doesn't belong here. Sorry. If you want your article here, you'll first need to pester some journalists into agreeing it's notable enough that they should take note and write about it. My rule of thumb is that you need two good articles from traditional print sources to establish notability for a new software product. Msnicki (talk) 18:58, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.