Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ION (IPTV)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ION (IPTV) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG; may be promotional Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:01, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The text is unreferenced promotional and personal work. -The Gnome (talk) 14:48, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:31, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:31, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Unable to find sufficient coverage in RS. Hrodvarsson (talk) 02:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- (Duplicate vote!/thought about this being a hoax removed by nominator Nate • (chatter) 04:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC))
- Comment Looks like a legit service without a lot of WP:N (it has a website with a good service description), but this is a case of IP's having a go at a low-edited article (that's been around for nine years here), not a hoax. Don't make this claim without a good amount of proof, please (And vote! has been struck since you nominated the article; it's virtually assumed you want it deleted). That said... Nate • (chatter) 03:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Another IPTV service without much market pickup or sourcing or N. Nate • (chatter) 03:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.