Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPT135

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Interesting name, though; air charter operations are regulated under 14 CFR Part 135. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IPT135

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, only local coverage reporting that "now there is a charter service at our airport". Largoplazo (talk) 11:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Reads like a press release; non-notable.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 21:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable charter company. Only brief mentions.L3X1 (distænt write) 01:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete lacks RS. Fails GNG. Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.