Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IUVSTA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 17:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IUVSTA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A lot of issues, not one of the CSDs, so nominate for deletion. 333 -blue 08:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 08:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 08:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 08:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 08:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 15:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete I'm seeing some coverage, but mostly passing mentions and primary sources. Absent a demonstration of significant secondary coverage, I'd say it fails WP:ORG. Although, a better deletion nomination statement from 333-blue would have been nice, to explain what these many non-CSD issues you see are. --Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 19:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with NickW557's comment. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to show it meets notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.