Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am Oak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 10:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Oak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is insufficient independent coverage to meet the requirements of WP:NMUSIC. If this is kept, it should be clarified whether this is a band or an album ("creative output"?) and what Mr. Kuijken's relationship to this project is (since he is the only one listed in the lede). Cmprince (talk) 12:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Gongshow ^Talk 15:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Gongshow ^Talk 15:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU ^tp* 11:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As the page is used by BBC Radio to link to their 'artist playing' system I think its important it remains as the artist has had several BBC radio plays using this system. Mick.scholefield (talk) 13:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – My searches turn up some independent coverage such as reviews in musicOMH [1], and in the Hamburger Abendblatt: Teuber, Kerstin (26 January 2012). "Horen und glucklich sein", Hamburger Abendblatt. Also "Vorlaf" Die Tageszeitung [Berlin] 5 Aug 2011, p. 26; reprinted here. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:00, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:52, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources noted above satisfy WP:MUSIC along with what is already listed in the article; cleanup needed, of course, but the group is notable enough for inclusion. Chubbles (talk) 01:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.