Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Can Make You a Man (Reprise)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nothing to merge, fails NSONGS, redirect pointless as anyone searching for the song is going to find the main article Black Kite 12:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I Can Make You a Man (Reprise) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:NSONG and does not cite sources. Any reason why this song is important enough to have it's own article? Gosox5555 (talk) 02:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Exactly what does it need to cite for it to be appropriate enough not to delete it?
The song is 1:45 minutes long. The length of some very popular songs known to man. Why cannot it have its own page along with every other rocky horror song?--McCuddenn (talk) 02:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I do suppose you're right. You know I never actually thought of that before? He does interrupt the song! When he comes out of the freezer! —Preceding unsigned comment added by McCuddenn (talk • contribs) 02:41, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to I Can Make You a Man. Why, because it's a reprise of that song, not really a separate song, finishing what was started before Meat Loaf interrupted the party. Yes, all the songs in Rocky Horror are notable because the books and videos, etc. provide significant non-trivial coverage. Drawn Some (talk) 02:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. Nothing to merge due to the lack of reliable, third-party, sources. Redirect pointless due to the non-plausible nature of the article name as a search term. Esradekan Gibb "Klat" 12:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.