Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ida R. Alldredge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ida R. Alldredge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:BEFORE searches, this subject fails WP:BASIC and WP:MUSICBIO. This source provides a short paragraph about the subject, but is not significant in its depth of coverage, and per searches, no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources appears to exist at all. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies GNG. Search for eg [1] [2] etc. James500 (talk) 00:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@James500: Could you provide some specific sources that provide significant coverage? I looked through the search parameters you listed, but the ones that are readable are passing mentions, and the rest are snippet views, some of which are also passing mentions, while other appear to be possibly or even likely as such. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:09, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 02:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Perhaps within LDS circles Alldredge may be notable, but here it does not meet the notability standards. Singing in religious meetings and publishing poems with little circulation outside of religious circles could not serve as barometers of remarkability for WP. Caballero/Historiador^⎌ 16:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I agree with Northamerica1000 that the sources presented aren't sufficient. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.