Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/If I Don't Have You
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- If I Don't Have You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete A song that does not assert notability, only has youtube videos listed as refs Dougofborg(talk) 12:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Creator (Braunsta (talk · contribs)) also created Marco Bosco, which seems equally lacking in notability ("Recently, he has just released his first single in the United States, entitled "If I Don't Have You" which is currently available on iTunes." - ah, iTunes! The 21st century equivalent of self-publication!) Recreate once iTunes delivers chart success. Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 13:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —TexasAndroid (talk) 15:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails notability per WP:NSONGS as artist is about to be deleted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.