Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifco tray (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Cirt (talk) 20:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ifco tray

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should have been prodded or CSD'ed but previosu AFD prevents it. Long unreferenced article with no significant claim to notability, and per previous afd there are no sources to significantly expand the article Sadads (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It's a stub with one source. Meph^talk 16:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — Meph^talk 16:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I managed to find two other verifiable sources this time around and have added them to the article. I've also copyedited to move the article toward a more general discussion of the use of these trays as returnable shipping containers and its effect on commerce, the environment and the tension between first-world consumers and third-world producers. I'm still nonplussed as to why such an ubiquitous product had so few easily locatable references. (I know it's OR to point out that I can see these every time I go shopping for fruit and veg.) Geoff ^{Who, me?} 01:32, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Coverage in the OECD booklet makes it notable, and also has neutral coverage with both pros and cons. FuFoFuEd (talk) 08:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- DQ (t) (e) 22:26, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It looks like the sources added by Glane are enough to demonstrate notability. Qrsdogg (talk) 18:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.