Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikechukwu Odikpo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ikechukwu Odikpo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails NPOL and GNG Chetsford (talk) 22:03, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:37, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:37, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This has a decidedly advertorial lean to it, and contains nothing that would confer an automatic pass of any of Wikipedia's subject-specific inclusion standards — he's not a political officeholder, but merely a political party organizer, which is not an WP:NPOL pass. And the sourcing doesn't get him over WP:GNG either — of the five footnotes here, two are unnecessary reduplications of one of the other three, so we're really looking at three sources, not five. And of those three, two are Q&A interviews in which he's giving statements of opinion about something other than himself, which are not sources that can assist a GNG pass because they're not coverage about him — and the third is here to verify a tangential fact about a project his party was involved in, but completely fails to even mention his name in conjunction with that at all, so it contributes nothing toward notability either. Bearcat (talk) 16:58, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 17:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a routine search on Google News brings up nothing. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:05, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete subject of discission does not qualify WP:GNG & thus does not merit a stand alone article on the encylopedia Celestina007 (talk) 14:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.