Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilusion tequila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Who is "we"? Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ilusion tequila

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable Tequila brand. Article creator has a possible WP:conflict of interest. Only references is to a trademark registry and a facebook page. Google searches find nothing of significance. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 15:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete New product, lacking multiple reliable and independent sources with significant coverage needed to satisfy notability. The article is also promotional in tone. Edison (talk) 15:08, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per complete dearth of coverage; what Edison said. jorgenev 16:28, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let it stay - Yes, it is a new product, and we wrote the article without using much external resources but we'll improve it. Now when I know what it takes, i'll rewrite the promotional tone — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.67.40.184 (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.