Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagine H2O

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 00:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine H2O

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not enough reporting from independent sources, and those are not in much depth. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 19:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 19:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include:

National Geographic
Water Tech
Techcrunch
The Business Journal
Journal-Sentinel
Milwaukee Business Journal
Food Safety Magazine
Milwaukee Biz Times (paid subscription magazine [1]).
Computer World

– NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:52, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 18:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per NorthAmerica. GoldenRing (talk) 09:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
im inclined to withdraw my AFD, based on NorthAmericas research. i havent checked it myself, but they are reliable.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.