Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imran Pratapgarhi (Poet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted. Hoax based on content from Rahat Indori. Creator blocked as a suspected sock. utcursch | talk 22:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Pratapgarhi (Poet) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this biography, created by an indefinitely blocked sock account, does not appear to meet notability criteria outlined in WP:BIO. Evaluating the references I find that the following: 1) the Twocircle.net reference is a local news story that merely includes the subject in a single sentence among a list of others, 2) second reference is a dead link, but appears to have been just an alumni directory listing, 3) third reference does not mention the subject, and 4) subject's own webpage. It boils down to no independent sources supporting notability of the subject. Deli nk (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.