Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of cooperation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Radiofax#Transmission details. Jenks24 (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Index of cooperation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY criteria Boleyn (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nomination. MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 00:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:40, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fax, or whichever daughter article is appropriate, merging anything that isn't already present. This is a plausible redirect: [1]. We do not delete plausible redirects. WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP. James500 (talk) 23:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I should also point out that dictionary definitions (if for the sake of argument this is one) are supposed to be copied to Wiktionary using the import process, and the correct !vote for this is "transwiki", not "delete". I should also point out that NOTDICTIONARY is not a free pass for removing all definitions. James500 (talk) 23:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I should also point out that we have many articles that are glossaries (eg Glossary of chess). We could have a Glossary of Telecommunication Terms, or something similar, and include this. James500 (talk) 00:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Radiofax#Transmission details where the term is defined and explained. This term is only relevant for old drum-style fax machines. I was unable to find more than simple definitions in Google. No doubt there are historical paper sources that discuss this term in more detail, but until those are found. this is a plausible search term and is verifiable, so a redirect is warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 19:02, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Radiofax#Transmission details per Mark viking. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.