Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indietronic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:17, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Another imaginary music genre. The bands listed as purportedly part of this genre are described with different terminology in their own articles—Wahoofive (talk) 23:59, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I don't know much about this, but "indietronic" gets 17,100 google hits. "Indietronic" can be a real trend in popular music without there necessarily being many bands primarily identifying themselves by that label.--Pharos 03:05, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- 17,100? I got 706 -- Kjkolb 05:33, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I did a general search in all languages, not just English. The term seems to be somewhat more common in some other European languages.--Pharos 05:44, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops, I forgot I had the English only turned on. -- Kjkolb 06:03, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment just because a portmanteau term like this gets used a lot, that doesn't necessarily make it worthy of an encyclopedia article; it just makes it a neologism and dicdef. —Wahoofive (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If it can be expanded into a proper article, it's not a dicdef. And certainly it's not a neologism if it gets used a lot ··gracefool |☺ 07:53, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment just because a portmanteau term like this gets used a lot, that doesn't necessarily make it worthy of an encyclopedia article; it just makes it a neologism and dicdef. —Wahoofive (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops, I forgot I had the English only turned on. -- Kjkolb 06:03, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand - despite being bad portmanteau. --MacRusgail 18:22, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep ··gracefool |☺ 07:51, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.