Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Influx Magazine
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 04:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Influx Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable magazine. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 26. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 00:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Appears to not meet WP:GNG. Source searches in news and book sources are not providing much coverage in reliable sources (rs), let alone significant coverage. Only finding passing mentions in rs. NorthAmerica1000 03:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources. Looks like a reliable source itself, but I don't think it's notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No sources, no notability... --Randykitty (talk) 22:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. EthicallyYours! 13:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence that it meets WP:GNG.160.36.8.237 (talk) 18:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Not notable; lack of sources. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.