Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infobase
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. This is an A1 and A3 (linkspam) speedy, and so the deleters have things heavily on their side. I am firmly discounting Hipocrite's comment: it is not an appropriate way to participate in AfD. I find Gateman1997 and Yuckfoo to have extremely weak positions having cited no reason at all for their recommendation. If either of them had put their article edits where their comments are, then things would clearly be different. Jtmichcock on the other hand at least has something to say. If Hipocrite wants a Deletion Review, s/he is free to request one himself. -Splashtalk 04:16, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
NN, D ComCat 02:08, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Non-notable Deyyaz 04:16, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nearly qualifies for db-empty tag. Jasmol 04:50, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, substub, has one incoming link according to Google. Google also finds 42 pages in the same domain. Utterly non-notable. - Mgm|(talk) 10:20, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Malformed AFD. Hipocrite - «Talk» 13:37, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and please stop voting to "keep" because of the nomination. Note the incorrect nomination, if you wish, but do not suggest that Wikipedia keep an "article" that is merely a predicate nominative because of that nomination. The article could easily be a speedy for lack of content. Geogre 15:07, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note also that user:Hipocrite states on his talk page that he has not read the articles nominated by ComCat that he is voting "keep" on. They should not, therefore, be regarded as deliberations on the article but rather as some sort of point. Geogre 20:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have made no such statement regarding reading the article. If my votes are disregarded by the closer and that results in a different result than if my vote was regarded, I request that the closer bring this article to deletion review voluntarily. Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:56, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Note also that user:Hipocrite states on his talk page that he has not read the articles nominated by ComCat that he is voting "keep" on. They should not, therefore, be regarded as deliberations on the article but rather as some sort of point. Geogre 20:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand.Gateman1997 22:13, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep and expand this please Yuckfoo 23:08, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand per above. They appear to have a number of participants and articles for a new venture. Jtmichcock 02:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Wikipedia is not a web directory. → Ξxtreme Unction {yakłblah} 12:08, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.