Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Technology Association of America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:05, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information Technology Association of America

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability and without independent citations to back up its claims, it's little more than fancrust. Misterdiscreet (talk) 21:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article has lots of references, but they weren't formatted properly. They are now. Some of the links to the organization's own site are broken, but can probably be fixed. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Eastmain - this seems to be pretty well-sourced now. Addionne (talk) 20:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but I can see why it would be considered prommotional at first reading--there was n awful lot of spam--a list of every one of the member organizations, and of all the officers-- that Eastmain has now removed DGG ( talk ) 08:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - even after Eastmain's improvements I thought this was headed for the deletion block at first glance, but in amongst the self-citations and press releases are some credible sources, particularly about the association's support of Real ID. It will take more rewriting to prevent another well-intentioned editor from nominating this again, however.--~T P W 15:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.