Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Injective (platform)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 01:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Injective (platform)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not convinced there is sufficient mainstream reliable news coverage independent of the topic here, per WP:CORP and WP:NCRYPTO. Uhooep (talk) 01:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Products, Technology, and Internet. C F A 💬 02:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are multiple articles from reliable sources that are about the company and its products. The announcements of $$investments don't generally add to notability, but the articles in TechCrunch and ZDnet are substantive. (I do note that one source is marked as failing verification and a G-books search inside it gets zero hits for Invective. That source should be removed. I'll see if I can find another source for that.) Lamona (talk) 01:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find the platform has received coverage from multiple reliable sources and plays some not minor role in the Web3 and DeFi.Dirubii Olchoglu (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to be notable for its industry. It has ZDnet, books, Techcrunch and other coverage. ג'ימיהחיה (talk) 11:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please note: "TechCrunch may be useful for satisfying verifiability, but may be less useful for the purpose of determining notability".
  "ZDNet was acquired by digital marketing company Red Ventures in October 2020. There is consensus that ZDNet, along with other online properties of Red Ventures, is generally unreliable. Editors express concern that Red Ventures, as a matter of policy, uses AI-authored content on its properties in a non-transparent and unreliable manner". Uhooep (talk) 16:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC
  - The analysis of Tech Crunch at Perennial Sources is a warning, and advises that one should make sure the article is written by a legit author and isn't some random blog post. In this case, the author is Mike Butcher (journalist) who does appear to be a reliable journalist in this area. Lamona (talk) 04:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.