Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inkurdish
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Inkurdish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails to demonstrate notability. Cannot PROD - was contested previously because the page was created by a new user. Little improvement has been made since however. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. As written, clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability (websites) due to 0 non-primary references. WP:NOTDIRECTORY. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability offered or to be found. Happy to revisit if evidence can be found. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:12, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.