Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instance (World of Warcraft)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect is optional. - Mailer Diablo 01:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Instance (World of Warcraft)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Pure and simple: game cruft.

Only players of World of Warcraft would find this information usable. Per WP:N, it does not have any significance outside of World of Warcraft and its players. IAmSasori 21:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment On the heels of the RuneScape AfD sequence, and on the still-warm corpse of the original AfD comes another group of nominations from an editor who has five minor edits a month prior to these noms. I make no apologies for sounding cynical, however, I am still getting that feeling that someone is still trying to make a point. I guess I'd feel a little more confident in this whole series of AfDs if they were nominated by an editor who has a little bit more of an active history. I do disclose a conflict-of-interest, as I am a contributor to several of these. Yngvarr (t) (c) 22:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also pointing out that the number of edits to each article is irrelevant to the merits of the articles. David Fuchs^(talk) 18:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of independent notability. Game guide-y. shoy 18:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: We already have an article for Instance Dungeon, an article is not needed for every game that features one. Deathawk 18:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete game guide fancruft. Ridernyc 22:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to instance dungeon. Seems like the obvious way to go. --UsaSatsui 16:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per my reasoning on the other AfDs. David Fuchs^(talk) 18:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. —Gavin Collins 15:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Instance Dungeon, no RL relevance at all. -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.