Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isifa Image Service

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isifa Image Service

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Prod declined by anon years ago, but the rules still say we have to take it here, so - sigh. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It seems unusual that a digital economy firm would have an Under Construction sign as its website presence, apparently for a year or more. My searches are finding only directory listings for this firm, the best being the profile here, but that is insufficient as evidence of notability whether as a local agency or in its own right. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO. Poorly sourced and no indications of notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.