Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Issues with smartphone use

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 05:27, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with smartphone use

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR, WP:NPOV. Dunno even if the sources are even fine, as it's quite literally Japanese to me. :P slakr^\ talk / 09:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Surely a candidate for Speedy Deletion or at least a redirect to the Issues section of Smartphone Mike1901 (talk) 09:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article is redundant to Smartphone#Issues. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:08, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Essay /original research. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:10, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Waffling essay and original research. --DAJF (talk) 11:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the waffling. Article provides insights into smartphone usage not found on wikipedia yet and supported by research data. Rather than delete, how about a redirect to Issues section of Smartphone User:kyodaiteeter — Preceding undated comment added 13:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per RHaworth & User:kyodaiteeter - Looks like an essay. NickCT (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:No original research. This article is a synthesis of published material, which is original research. - tucoxn\^talk 02:34, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - violates WP:SOAP and WP:FORK. Bearian (talk) 22:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It is an essay about this and that of relevance to Japan only. Not encyclopedic material. Imaginatorium (talk) 09:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.