Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JHUMUNC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JHUMUNC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per GNG. Only sourced are from inside John Hopkins. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: article is under CSDA7 at the moment, but I think it will be declined. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete - fails notability. Natureium (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:52, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is long past time we made a minimum requirement that all articles have at least one listed source to even be created.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:53, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.