Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Thomas Smith
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jack Thomas Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable film maker. His only credit on imdb is for "Disorder", a non-notable film. A Google search for "'Jack Thomas Smith' Disorder" comes up with only 119 hits, including such non-reliable sources as Myspace. There are two Google news hits for that search, but they're local newspapers discussing using local sites for his filming. The editor who is creating this page appears to be associated with Fox Trail Productions, Smith's production company, which has, according to imdb, only made this one film. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 19:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. Fails WP:CREATIVE. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not meet notability at this time - maybe one day--AssegaiAli (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article was created by his company (see username is his company). With that said, if he's due to have notability, needs major clean-up and formatting. BioDetective2508 (talk) 14:38, 1 July 2009
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.