Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jageshwar Prasad Khalish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jageshwar Prasad Khalish

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable person. Speedy was declined, but no sources provided. I wasn't able to find any reliable sources by myself. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A "JUGESHWAR PRASAD KHALISH" is listed as a successful candidate in the Election Commission of India State Election 1951 to the Legislative Assembly of Bihar (p4) which could be sufficient for WP:POLITICIAN #1 though it would be good to obtain supporting information. AllyD (talk) 13:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Hindi language search for Jageshwar Prasad Khalish provides this link which indicates "Jugeshwar Prasad Khalish" and "Jageshwar Prasad Khalish" are indeed the same person. Indian language names at times have multiple spellings when translated to English (see WP:INDAFD). The subject is a former Member of Legislative Assembly so is notable under WP:NPOL. The link contains substantial information for a decent size stub. Pratyush (talk) 17:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It is a common variation of name. He meets NPOL. I request closing editor to move it to Jugeshwar Prasad Khalish (leaving existing title as redirect). "Jugeshwar" is what is mentioned in English language sources ([1], [2]). Anup [Talk] 14:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, state legislators are notable per NPOL. --Soman (talk) 16:07, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.