Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahnava Devi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. General consensus. (non-admin closure) Nördic Nightfury 10:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jahnava Devi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability guidelines not met. Jahnava is only mentioned in one book from 1997 and not in any notable way. Snood1205 (talk) 19:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 03:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 07:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 07:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 00:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- there are quite a few sources under books --David Tornheim (talk) 11:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- fails WP notability standards. Takanori Tomimatsu (talk) 06:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~Keep-~~fails WP:GNG.~~Changing !vote per David Tornheim Winged Blades^Godric 14:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Edited at 14:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – As David Tornheim said, there are a significant number of book results—more than the one noted by the nominator. J 947 05:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since the discussion only started after the second relist, I'm making an exception and am relisting this discussion a third time so that the book sources mentioned by David Tornheim can be considered.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 14:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – As per David Tornheim.FITINDIA (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.