Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Anderton (RAF officer)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- James Anderton (RAF officer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Unremarkable pilot. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 04:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No claim of notability. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no claim to notability --Whiteguru (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, Per above fails WP:GNG Alex-h (talk) 12:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.