Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Schweiterman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Schweiterman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable former actor. Article is largely unsourced except for an IMDb link and a Palm Beach Post reference. Fails WP:NACTOR. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Film. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can find two short paragraphs in a "where are they now" article about the cast, and in a dubious source, and a couple of mentions in four or five not-very-strong sources. Nothing substantial. Does not meet GNG. Lamona (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: Just enough coverage of his character... There's a sequel coming out, talk of him having a cameo, so there is some recent coverage as well. [1], [2], [3]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this person does not seem independently notable. Brad (talk) 00:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no independent detailed coverage. - Altenmann >talk 02:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no significant coverage Mr Vili talk 04:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.