Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Bird

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Bird

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unreferenced biography. In looking for references in secondary sources to add to it, it became aparrent that none appear to exist, despite the aparrently high profile career. The subject's own website, however, bears a striking similarity to the article. So this appears to fail WP:V and WP:N, plus there are real concerns about WP:NPOV and WP:COPYVIO. RichardOSmith (talk) 14:49, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unreferenced BLP and possible copyvio. Chester Markel (talk) 01:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks references and fails WP:BK and WP:AUTHOR. Qworty (talk) 08:58, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.