Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japan Airlines Flight 115

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Japan Airlines Flight 115

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been nominated for a merge but it was done incorrectly as the merge is at the talk page page for Talk:Japan Airlines flight 123 (note lower case f) which does not exist. The actual article is at Japan Airlines Flight 123. This article should be deleted as it's contents are already in the JAL 123 article. Elshad (talk) 09:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Elshad (talk) 09:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-There's no point in merging this article at all. People might want to visit this article to gain more insight on why the tail of this Boeing 747 plane fell off in JAL 123. JTZegers (talk) 15:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Kadzi   (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.