Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarius Page

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 15:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jarius Page

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. Promo article for a BLP. References are profiles, about us pages, blog entries and an interview. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 16:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and North Carolina. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - In agreement with @Scope creep. This article does not meet the notability requirements. - The9Man ^Talk 17:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, and Politics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I am unable to see anything notable about the subject in the article, and a web search didn't turn up anything non-promotional. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete definitely fails WP:GNG and pretty blatant promotion. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.