Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Mace
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Jason Mace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD (mine) removed, without comment, by an SPA who has appeared since the original author was recently blocked for promotional edits related to the tent company. PROD rationale was "Promotional biography by somebody connected to the subject, if not the subject himself. The awards are not convincing. Some of the references are not convincing (e.g. YouTube). Much here is unconvincing. There may be a very little genuine notability but it does not seem to justify an article far less a hagiography." I have nothing much to add to that except to note that Chamber of Commerce is a type of organisation, not a single monolithic organisation, an unusual misconception that both the original author and the new SPA mysteriously seem to share. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 22:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now as I found nothing better than this and this. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I've been watching this page since shortly after it was created, and while I tried to keep the worst of the promotional spam to a minimum it seems to have slipped off my radar. Hardly any of the references actually talk about Mace himself, and the ones that do sound like press releases dripping with praise. Gala Tent may be worth having an article about, but not Mace. It doesn't help that it's the work of three (blocked) SPAs. Primefac (talk) 15:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.