Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javaid Rahi
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲水 10:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Javaid Rahi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is highly promotional, and is likely an autobio. He is closely associated with a cultural wing of a state-funded organization, (J&K academy of art,culture and Languages).Based on the article, it seems he is a leading cultural promoter of the Gujari langauge and culture. But the lack of notable awards and independent news sources make it seem he is not notable. Daiyusha (talk) 12:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:54, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not meant to be a platform for self promotion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 10:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 10:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a promotional article, sourced to primary sources, passing mentions in unreliable secondary sources, and one dead link. Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete = extraordinary claims require extraordinary sources. Bearian (talk) 01:43, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.