Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Mo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is a very slight majority for deletion, but nothing approaching a consensus. Even though this is a BLP, Cunard has pointed out that the subject received significant coverage in the cited news article, and that sort of evidence weighs heavily in AFD discussions. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:36, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Mo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Only two reliable sources. Other than that not notable. The Avengers 16:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)~~ Reverted as per WP:BANREVERT. 01:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Worth noting that this is almost certainly a paid-for article. Number 5 7 18:08, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 20:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 20:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 20:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 20:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Searches unsurprisingly found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 02:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ssт✈^(discuss) 03:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ssт✈^(discuss) 03:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ssт✈^(discuss) 03:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A few of the media mentions checked out. The article needs some clean up, though. South Nashua (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I read the article and refs and they don't shout notability, they say nn individual and hum drum internet 'refs' with no depth. Szzuk (talk) 20:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per RS. I agree with South Nashua| that the article needs to be cleaned up. ADDED - Nom even admits there are at least two RS! --MurderByDeletionism^"bang!" 06:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches turned up no in-depth coverage from reliable sources in which to show they meet notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In addition to the sources in the article, here is another source about the subject:
- Twum, Chris (2013-11-15). "Jay Mo Picks Up African Oscar". The Ghanaian Chronicle. Archived from the original on 2015-12-20. Retrieved 2015-12-20.
  The article notes:
  
  As well as England, Mohan also grew up in Liberia, Nigeria, Ghana and India, before relocating to Los Angeles in 2010 to pursue a career in the film industry.
  In the last 12 months, he has collaborated with, and promoted various music artistes, and has now directed and produced over 100 music videos, 40 shorts and documentaries, seven commercials, and one TV pilot.
  Fresh from his African Oscars success, the musician and film maker has seen his debut short film, ‘The Successor of Katunga’ winning rave reviews on the independent film and festival circuits.
Cunard (talk) 07:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.