Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Huber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will salt. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Huber

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy biographical notability. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Google search shows many of the usual vanity hits, many containing the phrase Frequent, Fast Turnaround, Cheap and Easy (FFCE). (Of course. Isn't this an effort to use FFCE as a tag line?) This proves that he exists and uses social media enthusiastically; we knew that. No apparent significant coverage by third parties.

Copied from draft space into article space while waiting for review in draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NBIO and WP:PROMO; frankly it would probably qualify as a G11 but since it's already at AfD, we may as well just do this. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:59, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I AFC declined this two weeks ago for being portrayed as executive linkedin and asked for WP:THREE sources. Not much improvement since then, and was created in mainspace anyway. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - one of the author's sockpuppets was OpenCovidScreen (talk · contribs) as in "Jeff is also the Co-Founder & President of OpenCovidScreen (2020-present)" which makes this look like a clear case of UPE for Huber and his business. Cabayi (talk) 19:38, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Add to that CaliforniaJane7864's blatant gaming of WP:ACPERM prior to creating the first copy of the article, I'm 100% convinced of UPE. Cabayi (talk) 19:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt against future UPE. There was once a copyvio picture of Huber in some prior reincarnation of the article/draft. I find none of our notablity criteria and a whole slew of our NO COI/UPE criteria fulfilled. Fiddle Faddle 19:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.