Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Wood (prisoner)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 11:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeff Wood (prisoner) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per WP:BLP1E. This person is only notable in the context of a single event. Elliskev 12:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Because of high coverage from media and its not just a single event.--Judo112 (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Well referenced. I would agree with the BLP1E deletion if the execution hadn't become a notable political football, especially one with multiple issues. Also, in this case the notability of the person is larger than the notability of the event. Darkspots (talk) 13:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the above arguments. Fumoses (talk) 14:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Cover the event, not the person. Stifle (talk) 15:57, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep In this case the nature of the charges is more significant than the murder itself, so the correct article is on the criminal. DGG (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 02:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Interesting is not notable. Thanks. JBackus13 (talk) 02:37, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable on many levels because of current events, plus mulitple legal actions.--MarkusBJoke (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.