Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen friel
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Jen friel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. I'm unable to locate any reliable sources to establish notability. Maybe someone else will have better luck. APK whisper in my ear 08:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I can't find anything for third party sources, iffy wording, almost reads like an ad. Delete for sure. --Fbifriday (talk) 09:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
what about www.fiestamovement.com/la ?!?! She was part of the LARGEST social media campaign in the country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WalterJ10 (talk • contribs) 09:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Firstly, do you have an independent reliable source for that? Secondly, notability is not inherited. Someone who cleans the floors at Microsoft's headquarters is part of a very notable business, but is not notable. Being "part of" a campaign does not confer notability, even if the campaign is notable. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sign of independent reliable sources anywhere. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't find significant coverage to establish notability. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 12:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – No reliable sources can be found. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 17:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all the reasons given above. Drmies (talk) 19:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above; same reasoning; lack of coverage in WP:RS Chzz ► 21:35, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So the real question is is Jen for real?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xhappyguyx (talk • contribs) 22:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.