Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennie Eisenhower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 07:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jennie Eisenhower

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Had a few minor roles, was cited in WaPo, but her main claim to fame (and the reason she has multiple puff pieces) is that she's related to two presidents. That does not add up to notability. Kleuske (talk) 12:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 12:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 12:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being a descendant of US presidents does not make one notable. Her acting career is no where near meeting notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Being the descendant of two presidents doesn't automatically confer notability, but it does make it more likely. The press seem interested in her, as both the New York Times and Washington Post have provided significant coverage. The nominator may feel that they're covering her for trivial reasons, but that's irrelevant. She passes WP:GNG. pburka (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Google news shows that she has appeared in dozens of productions, most of which are not mentioned in the article, and has directed quite a few productions. Being a two-time Barrymore Award winner (and 7-time nominee) separates her from the pack of working actors. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She won he Barrymore Award twice, and the facts of her parentage has generated significant coverage, meeting GNG. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 01:31, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - She passes general notability guidelines. Sourcing includes:

.....and many, many more.

Suffice to say, it's clear she passes WP:GNG. Missvain (talk) 02:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all these links! I know it's Christmas, but if anyone has time, it would be great to add information from these articles to Eisenhower's entry. Only two of them are already cited. Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ssilvers - I'll drop them on the talk page. Missvain (talk) 17:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, looks like you already did!

Missvain (talk) 17:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article has had some sourcing help since this AFD was opened. It's a work in progress, but Jennie is (sourced) notable enough to have an article. It's nowhere near eligible for deletion, at this point. — Maile (talk) 21:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep by a quick Google search, we can find multiple reliable sources, considering significant coverage. Brayan ocaner (talk) 10:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.