Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Hargrave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jenny Hargrave

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:ARTIST inclusion guidelines. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Two primary sources plus one routine student listing and a prediction of a future event (graduation). No evidence of notability indicated or found. Could be a WP:CSD A7? AllyD (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I considered using A7 but I prefer to be generous in assessing articles by new users (Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers), and so I considered that the sentence about her having produced a notable work was an "claim of significance".-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She may well become a notable artist, but she is not such yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.