Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jew gold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jew gold

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

antisemitic term when used outside of context, does not need its own redirects or article. Merely a mention as done in the South Park episode is more than sufficient. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 00:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Two extremely marginal, scrape-the-bottom-of-the-barrel entries don't warrant a dab page per WP:NOTEVENTWODABS. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because toxic waste goes in the barrel jengod (talk) 01:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism and Disambiguations. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as too insignificant for anything except possibly a redirect to Two Days Before the Day After Tomorrow. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. never even heard of it. NYC Guru (talk) 02:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete So it was used once on a tv show and in another case? Two obscure references, not needed here. Oaktree b (talk) 02:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the arguments already mentioned, ~~but an ATD would be to redirect to Two Days Before the Day After Tomorrow, considering Jewgold also redirects there.~~ LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 05:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With the low views for the redirects and with how bad of a term it is, add salt to my delete vote, and do the same to other versions of the term. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 16:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, and would also included the redirect for the article article Jewgold as well as it does not seem like a necessary redirect link. -
Epluribusunumyall (talk) 06:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As cited by above other fellow editors Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 11:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, salt, no redirect. Per Epluribusunumyall, the other redirect just doesn't make sense itself either as it's not even linked to the episode article itself, and its historic peak was merely 51 views in early 2021. This page only cleared above 125 views/day twice. It's otherwise pejorative and should not be here. Also don't forget the capitalized Jew Gold rd. Nate • (chatter) 16:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree, kill it with fire. Offensive on its face. If it were historic I'd say redirect, but the occurrences cited don't seem to warrant that. Elinruby (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, seems to be clear consensus to delete this, which as the nom, I just wanted to make sure that we also delete all the related redirects at the same time. I recently nominated two others, but if there are others too that I am missing lets try and get them all in one go. TY — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This will be unnecessary, since those redirects will be speedy deleted per G8 if this page is. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This was actually created by an account called "Alekkk" that was indefinitely blocked because of that username within two hours of that. Their other edit on the topic had single quotes around the adjective fictional for the racist idea. I guess we should have just denied recognition more thoroughly back in 2009. --Joy (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable so fails WP:GNG and offensive too. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete page and delete all redirects. Content listed is niche to be assumed that this is what a reader is looking for. Toomuchcuriosity (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.