Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish-Christian Gospels: Patristic Citations
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 12:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Jewish-Christian Gospels: Patristic Citations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article claims to have been newly moved from Wikisource, which I can't verify one way or another. However, I do not believe that the existing article provides any particular useful context to any of the works with which it deals, and I believe that, on that basis, it may well violate the policy regarding indiscriminate collections of information. Creator of the page is being notified of this discussion, and the Christianity and Bible projects have also been notified. John Carter 00:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One of the most complete collections of primary sources on the Jewish-Christian gospels I have seen. The Wikisource version should have a link to the pages of all three J-C gospels. However, a collection of primary sources does not make an article. Ovadyah 02:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as indiscriminant list of information. Handschuh-talk to me 02:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, though I concur that it appears to be a thorough list. Unfortunately, it's not a list that belongs here, per nom. I have also sorted the debate as Society (Religion). ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 04:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per Handschuh. FYI, it was deleted from WikiSource. - Rjd0060 04:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Hmm. These should be preserved somewhere, although not in an article here. Send it back to Wikisource for repairs. Ovadyah 13:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Agree; this should be kept somewhere, either at Wikisource or at Wikibooks. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Majoreditor (talk) 20:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.